Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40915433›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2026

Accelerated Patient-specific Non-Cartesian Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction Using Implicit Neural Representations.

Di Xu, Hengjie Liu, Xin Miao, Daniel O'Connor, Jessica E Scholey, Wensha Yang, Mary Feng, Michael Ohliger, Hui Lin, Dan Ruan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Di XuRadiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Hengjie LiuRadiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Xin MiaoRadiology at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Daniel O'ConnorCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Jessica E ScholeyRadiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Wensha YangRadiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Mary FengRadiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Michael OhligerRadiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Hui LinRadiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Dan RuanRadiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Yang YangRadiology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Ke ShengRadiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: ke.sheng@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Multi-Task MR Simulation for Abdominal Radiation Treatment PlanningR01EB029088 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FAN, ZHAOYANG, YANG, WENSHA · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
Motion Management of Pancreatic Cancer in MRI-Guided RadiotherapyR01CA188300 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHENG, KE · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Functional Avoidance Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Guided by MR Multitasking-driven Abdominal Integrated Imaging (MT-AI2)R01CA301509 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Zhaoyang Fan, Mary Feng · 2026 to 2026
$701k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188300NCI NIH HHS R01 CA301509NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccelerating magnetic resonance acquisition is essential for image guided therapeutic applications. Compressed sensing (CS) has been developed to minimize image artifacts in accelerated scans, but the required iterative reconstruction is computationally complex and difficult to generalize. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs)/Transformers-based deep learning methods emerged as a faster alternative but face challenges in modeling continuous k-space, a problem amplified with non-Cartesian sampling commonly used in accelerated acquisition. In comparison, implicit neural representations (INRs) can model continuous signals in the frequency domain and thus are compatible with arbitrary k-space sampling patterns. The current study developed novel k-space generative-adversarially trained INRs (k-GINR) for de novo undersampled non-Cartesian k-space reconstruction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: k-GINR consists of 2 stages: 1) supervised training on an existing patient cohort; 2) self-supervised patient-specific optimization. The StarVIBE T1-weighted liver data set, consisting of 118 prospectively acquired scans and corresponding coil data, was employed for testing. k-GINR is compared with 2 INR-based methods, Neural Representation learning methodology with Prior embedding (NeRP) and k-space NeRP, an unrolled deep learning method, Deep Cascade CNN, and CS.

resultsk-GINR consistently outperformed the baselines with a larger performance advantage observed at very high accelerations (peak-signal-to-noise ratio: 6.8%-15.2% higher at 3 times, 15.1%-48.8% at 10 times, and 29.3%-60.5% higher at 20 times). The reconstruction times for k-GINR, NeRP, k-NeRP, CS, and Deep Cascade CNN were approximately 3 minutes, 4-10 minutes, 3 minutes, 4 minutes and 3 second, respectively.

conclusionsk-GINR, an innovative 2-stage INR network incorporating adversarial training, was designed for direct non-Cartesian k-space reconstruction for new incoming patients. It demonstrated superior image quality compared to CS and Deep Cascade CNN across a wide range of acceleration ratios.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID40915433
PMCPMC13383804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.