Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40915052›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025

A deep learning-based approach for measuring patellar cartilage deformations from knee MR images.

Jefferson R Bercaw, Patrick X Bradley, Christopher C Otap, Lauren N Heckelman, Krystal S Tamayo, Kwadwo A Owusu-Akyaw, Andrzej S Kosinski, Roarke W Horstmeyer, Charles E Spritzer, Louis E DeFrate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jefferson R BercawDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: jefferson.bercaw@duke.edu.
Patrick X BradleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: patrick.bradley@duke.edu.
Christopher C OtapDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: christopher.otap@duke.edu.
Lauren N HeckelmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: lnh2117@columbia.edu.
Krystal S TamayoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: ktamayo2012@gmail.com.
Kwadwo A Owusu-AkyawDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: kowusuakyaw@gmail.com.
Andrzej S KosinskiDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: andrzej.kosinski@duke.edu.
Roarke W HorstmeyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: roarke.w.horstmeyer@duke.edu.
Charles E SpritzerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: chuck.spritzer@duke.edu.
Louis E DeFrateDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering & Materials Science, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: lou.defrate@duke.edu.

Funding

In Vivo Knee Motion and ACL Biomechanics During Dynamic ActivitiesR01AR065527 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2014 to 2024
$4.8M
Biomechanical and Biological Predictors of Cartilage Health Following Meniscus InjuryR01AR079184 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E., GOODE, ADAM · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Weight loss, in vivo cartilage mechanics, and joint healthR01AR074800 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
In vivo ACL mechanics and risk factors for injuryR01AR082665 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2024 to 2025
$1.3M
In Vivo Cartilage Mechanics and Degeneration After ACL DeficiencyR03AR063325 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2013 to 2015
$235k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065527NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074800NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079184NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR082665NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR063325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the United States, OA within the patellofemoral joint is understudied compared to the tibiofemoral joint. Mechanical alterations to cartilage may be among the first changes indicative of early OA. MR-based protocols have probed patellar cartilage mechanical function by measuring deformations in response to exercise. These studies, however, often rely on manual segmentation, which is time-intensive and may introduce variability. Therefore, our goals were (1) to develop convolutional neural networks to segment the patella and patellar cartilage from knee MR scans and (2) to evaluate the ability of these networks to measure exercise-induced cartilage deformations. Using a dataset of 109 knee MR scans, 2D and 3D U-Nets were developed and compared using the mean dice similarity coefficient (mDSC). Reliability of the best-performing networks was examined and the ability of these networks to detect patellar cartilage deformations following a hopping activity was evaluated. The 2D U-Net outperformed the 3D U-Net for both the patella (mDSC, 2D: 0.967 vs 3D: 0.960) and patellar cartilage (mDSC, 2D: 0.896 vs. 3D: 0.895). The 2D U-Nets demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.99, mean difference < 0.03 mm) in reproducing the mean patellar cartilage thickness across different days. Lastly, significant mean (mean ± standard deviation, 1.5 ± 1.8 %, P = 0.014) and maximum (10.6 ± 3.2 %, P < 0.001) patellar cartilage strains were detected following hopping. The autosegmentation tools developed herein provide a powerful framework for probing patellar cartilage mechanics in vivo.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularDeep LearningKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatellaAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerOsteoarthritis, KneeAutosegmentationBiomechanicsKnee osteoarthritisMachine learningPatellofemoral

Identifiers

PMID40915052
PMCPMC12781745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.