ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
A deep learning-based approach for measuring patellar cartilage deformations from knee MR images.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the United States, OA within the patellofemoral joint is understudied compared to the tibiofemoral joint. Mechanical alterations to cartilage may be among the first changes indicative of early OA. MR-based protocols have probed patellar cartilage mechanical function by measuring deformations in response to exercise. These studies, however, often rely on manual segmentation, which is time-intensive and may introduce variability. Therefore, our goals were (1) to develop convolutional neural networks to segment the patella and patellar cartilage from knee MR scans and (2) to evaluate the ability of these networks to measure exercise-induced cartilage deformations. Using a dataset of 109 knee MR scans, 2D and 3D U-Nets were developed and compared using the mean dice similarity coefficient (mDSC). Reliability of the best-performing networks was examined and the ability of these networks to detect patellar cartilage deformations following a hopping activity was evaluated. The 2D U-Net outperformed the 3D U-Net for both the patella (mDSC, 2D: 0.967 vs 3D: 0.960) and patellar cartilage (mDSC, 2D: 0.896 vs. 3D: 0.895). The 2D U-Nets demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.99, mean difference < 0.03 mm) in reproducing the mean patellar cartilage thickness across different days. Lastly, significant mean (mean ± standard deviation, 1.5 ± 1.8 %, P = 0.014) and maximum (10.6 ± 3.2 %, P < 0.001) patellar cartilage strains were detected following hopping. The autosegmentation tools developed herein provide a powerful framework for probing patellar cartilage mechanics in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.