The epidemiology, clinical burden, and prevention of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) related to surgically induced endometrial trauma: a systematic literature review and selective meta-analyses.

backgroundReproductive-age women with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) following uterine surgery may be asymptomatic or may experience light or absent menstruation, infertility, preterm delivery, and/or peripartum hemorrhage. Understanding procedure- and technique-specific risks and the available evidence on the impact of surgical adjuvants is essential to the design of future research. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: While many systematic reviews have been published, most deal with singular aspects of the problem. Consequently, a broadly scoped systematic review and selective meta-analyses identifying evidence strengths and gaps are necessary to inform future research and treatment strategies. SEARCH

methodsA systematic literature review was performed seeking evidence on IUA incidence following selected uterine procedures and the effectiveness of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on menstrual, endometrial, fertility, and pregnancy-related outcomes. An evaluation of the impact of surgical adjuvants designed to facilitate adhesion-free endometrial repair was included. Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases following PRISMA guidelines and included English-language publications from inception to 8 November 2024. Inclusion criteria restricted articles to those reporting IUA epidemiology or related clinical outcomes. Risk of bias assessment used the US NIH tools for interventional and observational studies. Meta-analyses were conducted and reported only for outcomes where there were sufficient data. Per analysis, we report on proportions (with 95% CI), heterogeneity (I2), and the risk of bias for each study included. OUTCOMES: The review identified 249 appropriate publications. The risks of new-onset IUAs following the removal of products of conception after early pregnancy loss, hysteroscopic myomectomy, and hysteroscopic metroplasty for septum correction were 17% (95% CI: 11-25%; 13 studies, I2 = 87%, poor to good evidence quality), 16% (95% CI: 6-28%; 8 studies, I2 = 93%, fair to good evidence quality), and 28% (95% CI: 13-46%; 8 studies, I2 = 91%, fair to good evidence quality), respectively. For primary IUA prevention with adjuvant intrauterine gel barriers, the relative risks were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.30-0.68; three studies, I2 = 0%, poor to good evidence quality), 0.38 (95% CI: 0.20-0.73; three studies, I2 = 0%, fair evidence quality), and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.12-0.69; three studies, I2 = 0%, fair to good evidence quality), respectively, following the above potentially adhesiogenic procedures. Following adhesiolysis without adjuvants, the IUA recurrence rate was 35% (95% CI: 24-46%; 13 studies, I2 = 95%, poor to good evidence quality), similar to the rate of 43% for both those treated adjuvantly with an intrauterine balloon (95% CI: 35-51%; 14 studies, I2 = 85%, poor to good evidence quality), or an IUD (95% CI: 27-59%; four studies, I2 = 85%, fair to good evidence quality). The recurrence rate for secondary prevention with gel barriers was 28% (95% CI: 4-62%; three studies, I2 = 94%, good evidence quality). Notably, there was an excess rate of associated adverse obstetrical outcomes, including preterm delivery, placenta accreta spectrum, placenta previa, peripartum hemorrhage, and hysterectomy, with evidence demonstrating the beneficial impact of adjuvant therapies on these outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: This systematic review comprehensively analyzes IUA formation following uterine surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy effectiveness. Even following adhesiolysis, it is apparent that the basilar endometrial trauma thought to facilitate the formation of IUAs may persist and contribute to adverse reproductive outcomes. Many critical gaps remain in our knowledge of the pathogenesis, prevention, and management of endometrial trauma and IUAs. PREGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023366218).