Observational studyGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in advanced gastric cancer using dynamic changes in peripheral blood clinlabomics data: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Observational study in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between blood urea nitrogen-to-potassium ratio trajectories and MAKE-30 risk in critically patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of key metabolic indicators associated with the comorbidity of ischemic stroke and diabetes mellitus using an optimal interpretable clinlabomics model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a pivotal role in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the biomarkers used to predict ICI efficacy are limited due to their reliance on single or static tumor characteristics. This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML) model that incorporates dynamic changes in clinlabomics data to optimize the predictive accuracy of ICI efficacy.
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective study utilized nine ML to construct the model. Participants were further stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups based on the predicted efficacy of ICI. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and RNA-sequencing were used for differential analysis.
resultsThis study enrolled 377 patients with advanced GC who underwent first-line ICI treatment across eleven hospitals between January 2018 and May 2023. Among them, 220 patients from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were selected for the development model. The remaining ten hospitals contributed to two external test cohorts. Ten dynamic clinlabomics features were identified. The XGBoost demonstrated optimal performance in predicting ICI response, achieving an AUC of 0.863 in the training cohort, and 0.790-0.842 in the validation and two external cohorts. Notably, the model exhibited strong predictive capabilities compared to single point-in-time and previously proposed model. In the subgroup analysis, the low-risk subtype demonstrated a significantly improved prognosis and exhibited characteristics of "hot tumors". A web tool was generated: https://ici-therapeutic-efficacy-predictor-ztwwfwek2uckbmhxlnsayq.streamlit.app/ .
conclusionsThe dynamic clinlabomics model can effectively predict the ICI efficacy in advanced GC. The model was validated using multicenter data and provides new evidence to optimize treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40914924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.