Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40914922›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction for ureteral stricture: a single-center series.

Alice Bourillon, Lucas Freton, Juliette Hascoet, Claire Richard, Camille Haudebert, Gregory Verhoest, Romain Mathieu, Lee C Zhao, Karim Bensalah, Benoit Peyronnet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Urology case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alice BourillonDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France. alicebourillon44@orange.fr.
Lucas FretonDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Juliette HascoetDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Claire RichardDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Camille HaudebertDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Gregory VerhoestDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Romain MathieuDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Lee C ZhaoNew York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Karim BensalahDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Benoit PeyronnetDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical approach of ureteral stricture has changed dramatically over the past 15 years with the rise of robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of all robotic ureteral reconstructions performed at a single academic center for ureteral stricture and to assess the predictive factors of stricture recurrence. The charts of all patients who underwent robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction between 2013 and 2024 at a single academic center were retrospectively reviewed. Many different surgical techniques were used including non-refluxing reimplantation with or without psoas hitch, refluxing ureteral reimplantation (side-to-side), Boari flap, uretero-ureterostomy, ureterolysis and buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty. The primary outcome was the absence of stricture recurrence, defined as no need for repeat surgery, urinary drainage, or symptomatic upper urinary tract dilation at the last follow-up. Sixty patients, accounting for 63 ureteral reconstructions, were included in the final analysis. Twenty-five patients experienced early postoperative complications (40%), the majority being Clavien-Dindo grade 2. There were only three (5%) major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3b). Stricture recurrence occurred in six patients (10%), with a median time to recurrence of 2.5 months postoperatively. Radiotherapy was the only factor significantly associated with an increased risk of stricture recurrence. The present series confirm the overall low morbidity and low recurrence rate of robotic ureteral reconstruction using a variety of surgical techniques. Comparative studies with longer follow-up periods are necessary to evaluate outcomes in comparison to traditional surgical approaches.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterUreteral ObstructionUrologic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeReconstructionRoboticsStrictureTreatmentUreter

Identifiers

PMID40914922
PMCPMC12414849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.