ArticleTransfusion2025
Plasma transfusion practice: A five-year audit of plasma transfusion at 23 hospitals.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasma transfusion practice: A five-year audit of plasma transfusion at 23 hospitals.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited high-quality evidence to guide plasma transfusion, and plasma transfusion practices remain variable. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that included adult medical and intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients (age ≥ 18 years) admitted to 23 hospitals in Canada between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, when both whole blood derived (~290 mL) and apheresis plasma (~250 mL) were available for transfusion. Nine additional hospital sites with missing plasma data or coagulation testing were excluded. Data collected included patient demographics, most responsible diagnoses, procedures, laboratory tests, transfusion information, and physician characteristics.
resultsAmong 950,740 included hospital admissions at 23 hospitals, there were 11,163 admissions with plasma use, with 46,377 plasma units transfused. Of the plasma recipients, 63.5% were male, with a mean age of 61.2 years (SD 16.4). Most plasma transfusions were administered in the ICU (64.1%). The number of plasma units transfused per 1000 inpatient days across centers varied from a median (IQR) of 0.2 (0.1-0.4) to 11.0 (10.6-12.0) units. There was significant variability in pre-transfusion INR values across hospitals (ranging from a median (IQR) of 1.5 (1.3-1.9) to 2.5 (1.4-4.6)) and physician specialties (ranging from a median (IQR) of 1.4 (1.3-1.8) to 2.2 (1.8-3.0)). There was no significant change in plasma utilization over the study period. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated variability in plasma utilization and pre-transfusion INR thresholds across hospitals and physician specialties. This highlights the importance of developing evidence-based guidelines and effective knowledge translation to guide appropriate plasma use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.