ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Attribute preferences associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists among women with endometriosis in the United States.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis symptoms have multifaceted manifestations, and there are few approved nonsurgical treatment options. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists/antagonists for endometriosis vary on efficacy, safety profile, and out-of-pocket (OOP) cost, among other features.
objectivesThis study quantified the importance that women with endometriosis in the United States (US) placed on pain and non-pain features that differ among these medications.
designEnglish-speaking, 18 to 50 years (premenopausal) US women with healthcare coverage for the past 3 years, who self-reported a laparoscopy-confirmed endometriosis diagnosis, were recruited via healthcare research panels to complete a cross-sectional survey.
methodsA discrete choice experiment (DCE) with a surgery opt-out option assessed preferences for eight GnRH agonist/antagonist attributes (reducing different types of pain, treatment administration, impact on daily activities, etc.). Best-worst scaling (BWS) assessed preferences for 11 non-pain medication attributes (dosage flexibility, short treatment onset, reversible side effects, etc.). Relative importance (RI) was estimated for each attribute.
resultsOverall, 300 women were included (mean age 33.0 years; 76.7% White). Across DCE choice tasks, GnRH agonist/antagonist was chosen over surgery 46.7% of the time. Non-menstrual pelvic pain relief (RI = 23.1%), reducing monthly OOP cost (RI = 22.1%), and relief of dyspareunia (RI = 21.4%) and dysmenorrhea (RI = 12.9%) were most important for GnRH treatment choice. Among non-pain attributes in the BWS, short onset of treatment effect (RI = 13.1%), long-term safety (RI = 12.9%), and reducing fatigue (RI = 11.2%) were most important to women when choosing a pharmacologic endometriosis treatment.
conclusionRelieving the three types of endometriosis pain and reducing cost are the most important considerations for women when selecting GnRH agonist/antagonist treatment. Women with endometriosis strongly prefer a medication that can be safely taken for longer periods of time, takes effect within a few menstrual cycles, and can reduce endometriosis-related fatigue. Findings can inform discussions between patients and healthcare providers to better align endometriosis treatment decision-making with patients' individual needs and preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.