ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Retrospective Study of Pediatric Sinonasal Tumors in a Tertiary Hospital Setting.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric sinonasal tumors are rare, accounting for about 4% of all pediatric head and neck neoplasms. Due to their nonspecific symptoms such as nasal obstruction, epistaxis, and facial pain, these tumors often present diagnostic challenges and lead to delays in managment. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to optimize clinical outcomes. CASE REPORT This is a retrospective review of 4 pediatric patients with diagnosis of sinonasal tumors at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The series includes 2 benign tumors, osteoma and juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, and 2 malignant tumors, NK/T-cell lymphoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Diagnostic workups included nasal endoscopy, CT, MRI, and PET-CT imaging, followed by histopathological confirmation. Benign tumors were successfully treated with image-guided endoscopic excision, with no evidence of recurrence during follow-up periods of 2 and 5 years, respectively, while malignant tumors required a multimodal approach, combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy under multidisciplinary care, and showed stabilization after treatment with continued surveillance. The variety in presentation and complexity of management underscore the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in this population. CONCLUSIONS This case series highlights the importance of early suspicion, comprehensive imaging, and individualized treatment plans in managing pediatric sinonasal tumors. The use of minimally invasive surgical techniques and preoperative embolization was effective in selected cases. The findings emphasize the role of multidisciplinary collaboration in optimizing outcomes for benign and malignant tumors. Future research should aim to develop standardized diagnostic algorithms and explore advanced diagnostic tools, such as molecular imaging, to facilitate earlier detection and improve treatment precision in pediatric sinonasal oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.