Observational studyMusculoskeletal surgery2026
Comparison between anterolateral standard and percutaneous antero-acromial approach in humeral intramedullary nailing (IMN). A radiological, functional, and ultrasound rotator cuff evaluation prospective study.
Observational study in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological-functional outcomes and rotator cuff (RC) status following humeral intramedullary nailing (IMN), comparing the anterolateral standard approach (group 1) and the percutaneous antero-acromial approach (group 2).
methodsThis observational prospective monocentric study was conducted from August 2021 to March 2023. Inclusion criteria included: two-parts proximal (surgical neck) and diaphyseal Humeral fractures treated with IMN; 12-month follow-up; age between 18 and 85 years; good performance status (excluding neurologic deficits or mental disorders). Evaluations included RC status via ultrasound, Constant, DASH, and SPADI scores, as well as fracture healing times. A T-test was used or statistical analysis.
resultsSixty-one patients were enrolled during the study period (34 in group 1; 27 in group 2). The mean bone healing time resulted 2.9 ± 0.5 months in group 1 and 2.4 ± 0.7 months in group 2, with a statistically significant reduction of 17% in favor of group 2 (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the Constant scores at 6 and 12 months of follow-up; however, significant differences were observed in DASH and SPADI scores (p < 0.05). Supraspinatus tears were detected in both groups: 6 in Group 1 (2 full-thickness and 4 partial) localized at the footprint, and 4 in Group 2 (1 full-thickness and 3 partial) assessed medially in the musculotendinous portion.
conclusionIntramedullary nailing with a percutaneous approach proved to be a minimally invasive technique with better functional outcomes and shorter fracture healing times. The impact on the RC was comparable to the standard approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40914742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.