Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40914391›Full record

ArticleIndian heart journal

Floating wire assisted device retrieval-a novel technique for prevention of guide-related coronary injury.

Atit A Gawalkar, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Pragya Karki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atit A GawalkarDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: atitgawalkar@gmail.com.
Rajesh VijayvergiyaDepartment of Cardiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Pragya KarkiDepartment of Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn inward force is experienced by the guide catheter during device retrieval resulting in potential risk of deep engagement into the ostio-proximal coronary segment. This undesired movement can result in coronary injury. There is no systematic data or reports of techniques to prevent such inadvertent guide movement during difficult retrieval of devices.

methodsIn 25 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, where the conventional methods of guide stabilization failed to prevent deep engagement of guide catheter during device retrieval we used 'floating aortic wire' technique and reattempted retrieval. The primary endpoint was the successful retrieval of the device without deep engagement of the guide.

resultsSuccessful retrieval was seen without deep engagement of guide in 23(92 %) patients. Left anterior descending(n = 15, 60 %) artery was the most common coronary artery. The XB guide(n = 14, 70 %) was the most commonly used guide for left coronary intervention while Judgkins right and Amplatz left were used most commonly for right coronary intervention. Stent balloon(n = 15, 60 %) was the most common device which required using floating aortic wire for retrieval. Other devices were jailed wire(n = 5,20 %), non-compliant balloon(n = 4,16 %) and cutting balloon(n = 1,4 %). Intravascular ultrasound did not show any guide related vessel injury(dissection or intramural hematoma) in any cases. The floating aortic wire failed to prevent deep engagement in two patients because of longer segment of jailed wire and long stent balloon in distal right coronary artery.

conclusionFloating aortic wire assisted retrieval of coronary devices is a simple, reliable and safe technique that prevents deep guide engagement during difficult retrieval.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDevice RemovalPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedCoronary AngiographyEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalFloating aortic wireGuide catheterIatrogenic dissection

Identifiers

PMID40914391
PMCPMC12793912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.