Observational studyResuscitation2025
Flow disruptions during delivery room intubation of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Observational study in Resuscitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimFlow disruptions (FDs) are deviations in the progression of care that compromise safety and efficiency of a specific process. Neonatal intubation is a life-saving high-risk procedure required for delivery room (DR) management of neonates with moderate to severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). This study evaluated FDs during DR intubation of neonates with CDH and their association with process and outcome measures.
methodsSingle-center observational study of video-recorded DR intubations of neonates with CDH. FDs were measured from birth through commencement of invasive endotracheal tube ventilation and classified using a neonatal FD tool and impact score. The primary outcome was time to invasive ventilation. Secondary outcomes were time to oxygen saturation (SpO
resultsBetween 11/2021 and 4/2023, 29 video-recorded resuscitations were included. A mean of 7.1 FDs/minute (±3.2) occurred before ventilation. Rate of high impact FDs was associated with a ventilation delay; a one FD/minute increase in rate of high impact FDs was associated with a 19.0 s (95 % confidence interval 4.6-33.4) ventilation delay and delay in pulse oximetry acquisition. Rate of medium impact FDs was associated with a delay in SpO
conclusionFDs occur frequently during DR intubation of neonates with CDH, and high impact FDs are associated with longer time to initiate invasive ventilation. FDs represent modifiable targets to improve CDH intubation and may generalize to other neonatal intubations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.