ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025
Patient and Health Professional Perceptions of the Assessment, Diagnosis and Management of Acute Charcot Neuro-Osteoarthropathy at a Regional Australian Health Service.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and Health Professional Perceptions of the Assessment, Diagnosis and Management of Acute Charcot Neuro-Osteoarthropathy at a Regional Australian Health Service.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) is a rare but serious complication of diabetes that requires timely diagnosis and evidence-based management to prevent long-term disability. In regional or rural settings, delivering evidence-based care is particularly challenging due to systemic and contextual barriers.
objectiveTo explore the perceptions of patients and health professionals about assessment, diagnosis and management of acute CN in a regional Victorian health service.
methodThis study used a qualitative research design, utilising thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients with previous acute CN and focus groups with health professionals (orthopaedic surgeons, podiatrists and prosthetists and orthotists) involved in the assessment and management of patients with acute CN. Two assessors used inductive thematic analysis to identify key themes related to acute CN care delivery.
resultsFour overarching themes were identified: (1) barriers to evidence-based care, including delayed diagnosis, limited access to skilled clinicians and diagnostic tools and the burden of treatment; (2) enablers, such as timely access to knowledgeable clinicians and resources; (3) mitigating factors, including patient engagement, empathetic communication and multidisciplinary support and (4) strategies for improvement, such as public and professional education, upskilling of health professionals and integration of psychological and person-centred support.
conclusionImproving outcomes for people with acute CN in regional or rural settings requires a multifaceted approach. Enhancing awareness, building workforce capacity and embedding patient-centred care practices are essential to ensure timely diagnosis, equitable access to treatment and improved quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.