ArticleTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2026
Comparative Analysis of Vehicles for the Regeneration of Mouse Endometrial Damage Model.
Article in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Regeneration of Endometrium in Asherman's Syndrome.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial damage is a critical factor contributing to infertility, particularly in women with refractory thin endometrium or intrauterine adhesions. Therefore, developing innovative therapeutic strategies for endometrial regeneration is essential. This study evaluates the regenerative potential of endometrial stromal cell (EMSC) injection and EMSC-loaded patch application in a mouse model with ethanol-induced endometrial damage.
methodsA mouse model of endometrial damage was established using ethanol injection into the uterine horn. EMSCs were isolated, cultured, and either HA-injected into the damaged endometrium or transplanted via a small intestinal submucosa (SIS)-based EMSC patch. Histological analyses were performed to assess endometrial thickness, gland regeneration, and fibrosis reduction.
resultsBoth EMSC injection and SIS-based EMSC patch engraftment promoted endometrial regeneration. However, the SIS-based EMSC patch group exhibited significant improvements in endometrial thickness, gland formation, and fibrosis reduction compared to the EMSC injection group.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the superior regenerative potential of an SIS-based EMSC patch over direct EMSC injection for endometrial repair. The findings suggest that scaffold-assisted cell therapy could be a promising approach for treating endometrial damage-related infertility. Further studies are required to optimize this strategy for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.