ReviewResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2025
Exploring the Frontiers of Technology in Forensic Psychiatric Youth Care: Ethical Challenges.
Review in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Bringing Technology to Justice-Involved Youth.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2026Article
- An Affordances-Based Approach and Scoping Review of Virtual Reality Applications in Forensic Behavioral and Mental Health Assessment and Treatment.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technologies such as virtual reality, wearables, and mobile apps have the potential to improve forensic psychiatric treatment of youths. Meanwhile, these technological advancements have given rise to new, complex ethical challenges. Paying attention to ethics is especially relevant in forensic psychiatric youth settings because of the often coercive context of treatment and the vulnerable patient population. The goal of this viewpoint paper is to identify and discuss important ethical challenges regarding the use of technology in forensic psychiatric youth care. In line with approaches within the domain of ethics, an analysis of relevant scholarly literature was used for this viewpoint paper. First, a general description, an overview of research on effectiveness, and examples from practice are provided for six technologies that can be used in forensic psychiatric youth care: virtual reality, internet-based interventions, mobile apps, wearables, neurotechnology, and games. Next, ethical challenges that are relevant for these technologies are explored, related to informed consent, privacy and data security, reliability and validity, equity, accessibility and usability, undesirable side effects, acceptability of content, persuasiveness, and evidence-based interventions. Interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers, patients, therapists, ethicists, technology developers, and forensic organizations is recommended for timely identification of ethical challenges and suitable solutions. We suggest that patients and therapists should be actively involved throughout all phases of the process, from development of the technology via co-creation to active participation in implementation and evaluation in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.