ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2025
European survey on metabolic and cardiovascular risk in Cushing syndrome.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "One-stop-shop" medical imaging for osteoporosis and obese patients: a narrative review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCushing's syndrome (CS) is associated with increased metabolic and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and morbidities. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of these issues in active or remitted CS are not available, so best practice is derived from guidelines developed for the general population. We aimed to evaluate the awareness and practice variation for CV comorbidities of CS across Reference Centres (RCs) of the European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN).
methodsA dedicated online survey was distributed from June 2022 to December 2022 to Endo-ERN RCs with recognized expertise in adrenal and/or pituitary diseases.
results19 centres provided complete responses to the survey, accounting for an estimated pool of around one thousand chronically cared CS patients across Europe. Most ERN experts consider patients with CS at high CV risk irrespectively of remission status. Preoperative cortisol-lowering treatment was a common practice, especially for severe cases, and deemed effective in reducing CV risk by many. Most comorbidities were regularly evaluated at diagnosis and during follow-up, although a lack of provocative testing to diagnose diabetes (used only in 26% of RCs) was evidenced. A strict glycaemic control was encouraged although its target differed. On the contrary, a less stringent approach to dyslipidaemia and overweight emerged. Preferred initial compounds for patients presenting comorbidities were angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, metformin and statins; lifestyle changes were preferred over drugs to control weight excess after cure. Screening for asymptomatic vascular disease was performed routinely and regularly repeated during follow-up by only half of the centres. Important heterogeneity in some responses emerged, especially regarding the effect of remission or medical treatment on comorbidities and CV risk. DISCUSSION: Our survey highlights the awareness of ERN experts on management of metabolic and CV risk factors or disease in CS. Most of them use the current European guidelines and apply strategies for high CV risk patients, although not all these recommendations were fully followed. Since several CV risk factors seem to persist after disease remission, they should be adequately and promptly addressed. Population-specific studies are required to identify the optimal management of CV and metabolic comorbidities of CS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.