ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Global research trends in endoscopic breast surgery: a bibliometric analysis from 1994 to 2024.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic versus endoscopic breast-conserving surgery: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes and aesthetic outcomes in breast cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Posterior Approach Partial Mastectomy (MAPP): Early Clinical Experience with a Novel Oncoplastic Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endoscopic breast surgery (EBS) is designed to reduce surgical trauma and optimize cosmetic outcomes through inconspicuous incisions. However, a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of research focus in EBS is lacking. This study aimed to analyze global publication trends, academic impacts, and evolving research directions in the field of EBS. The Web of Science Core Collection database was searched for publications related to EBS from database inception to December 31, 2024. Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica were utilized to analyze publication and citation trends, contributive countries, prolific institutions, influential authors, significant journals, and research hotspots. Among the 2074 publications initially identified, 333 met the inclusion criteria. The number of annual publications grew exponentially post-2019. China, South Korea, and the United States dominated research productivity, with Changhua Christian Hospital as the top institution. Lai HW was the most influential author, and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery was among the leading journals. Keyword analysis revealed a focus on endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy, breast reconstruction, and oncological safety. Research hotspots shifted from feasibility evaluations to advanced reconstructive techniques and robot-assisted surgeries. Research on EBS has undergone significant evolution over the past three decades. This study provides valuable insights into the current research landscape and development trends in EBS, offering guidance to researchers, clinicians, and policymakers to promote the field and improve patient outcomes. Priority should be given to future research evaluating long-term oncological safety, cost-effectiveness, and the implementation of large-scale multicenter trials to establish standardized protocols and evidence-based practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40913668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.