Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913664›Full record

ReviewPediatric surgery international2025

A roadmap of artificial intelligence applications in pediatric surgery: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and ethical considerations.

Miriam Duci, Arianna Bossi, Francesca Uccheddu, Francesco Fascetti-Leon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miriam DuciDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. ducimiriam@gmail.com.
Arianna BossiDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Francesca UcchedduDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Padova University, Padua, Italy.
Francesco Fascetti-LeonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly transforming healthcare, with growing interest in their application to rare pediatric surgical conditions. In these settings, limited data availability often brakes traditional research. Although pediatric surgery has historically been slower than other specialties in adopting ML, recent years have seen an increase in AI-driven tools designed for surgical care. This review presents an overview of AI applications in pediatric surgery, highlighting current uses, benefits, challenges, and their potential clinical impact. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies on AI and ML models relevant to pediatric surgery. The findings indicate that ML is mainly applied in predictive decision support, particularly for preoperative risk stratification, intraoperative navigation, and postoperative outcome prediction. AI is especially valuable in endoscopic and minimally invasive procedures, where it enhances the visualization of anatomical landmarks. In pediatric oncologic surgery, AI aids in the accurate localization and delineation of tumors. Additionally, AI improves pathology workflows through automated image analysis and annotation, supporting both diagnosis and education. Despite these advances, ethical and regulatory challenges remain. Ensuring data privacy and obtaining informed consent are essential. When responsibly implemented, AI can significantly improve pediatric surgical care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePediatricsSpecialties, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, OperativeChildHumansMachine LearningAritficial intelligenceComputer visionMachine learningNatural language processingPediatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID40913664
PMCPMC12414021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.