ArticleEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape2025
Long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery: A 25-year experience from a tertiary referral center.
Article in Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decades of Epilepsy Surgery Follow-up: What's Known and What's Not?Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery: A 25-year experience from a tertiary referral center.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDespite pharmacological advances in epilepsy treatment, one-third of patients remain pharmacoresistant and may require surgery. Despite extensive literature on epilepsy surgery, studies with follow-ups longer than 5 years are rare. Our goal was to analyze the outcomes of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery at our center, with a minimum follow-up of 15 years.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. We used the Engel classification to assess seizure freedom, performed univariate descriptive analysis of the variables of interest, and applied appropriate correlation tests for nominal and categorical variables, with statistical significance set at 0.05.
resultsWe included 160 patients with a minimum follow-up of 15 years. A total of 105 (70%) patients underwent resective surgeries, the most common being lesionectomy (46.7%), followed by anterior temporal lobectomy with amygdalectomy (21.9%). Among resective surgeries, 73.6% used intraoperative ECOG. Most surgeries were in the temporal lobe (68.8%), and mesial sclerosis was the most frequent etiology (33.8%), followed by long-term epilepsy-associated tumors (LEAT) (25.6%). Seizure freedom at 15 years was achieved by 57.5% of patients, and most of the remaining patients (63.2%) had rare disabling seizures. The majority (65%) discontinued at least one ASM. Temporal surgeries (χ SIGNIFICANCE: Appropriate referral to a refractory epilepsy center permits a multidisciplinary approach that can result in long-term seizure freedom for most patients undergoing surgery, especially for left-temporal lobe surgeries performed with the aid of intraoperative monitoring techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.