ArticleSmall methods2026
Improving HER2 Diagnostics with Digital Real-Time PCR for Ultrafast, Precise Prediction of Anti-HER2 Therapy Response in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying HER-2 for Precision Oncology: The Role of Optical Biosensors.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Improving HER2 Diagnostics with Digital Real-Time PCR for Ultrafast, Precise Prediction of Anti-HER2 Therapy Response in Patients with Breast Cancer.Small methods · 2026Article
- Development and epidemiological investigation of a TaqMan-based multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay for simultaneous detection of five bovine viruses (BVDV, AKAV, BNoV, BEV, and BCoV).Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) has emerged as a tumor-agnostic biomarker, standard HER2 testing for anti-HER2 therapies using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) assays remains subjective, time-consuming, and often inaccurate. To address these limitations, an ultrafast and precise HER2 testing method is developed using Lab-On-An-Array (LOAA) digital real-time PCR (drPCR), a fully automated digital PCR enabling real-time absolute quantification. A multicenter study involving four independent breast cancer cohorts cross-validates the high diagnostic accuracy of drPCR-based HER2 assessment. Comparative analyses with artificial intelligence algorithms, next-generation sequencing, and droplet digital PCR demonstrate that drPCR is faster, simpler, and more accurate than conventional assays for assessing HER2 status, while IHC/ISH frequently yields false positives. Importantly, in patients initially diagnosed as HER2-positive and treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, the HER2 drPCR(+)/IHC-ISH(+) group achieves high pathological complete response rates, while HER2 drPCR(-)/IHC-ISH(+) cases exhibit poor treatment responses, highlighting the superior predictive accuracy of drPCR for anti-HER2 therapy response. Additionally, drPCR identifies patients with chromosome 17 centromere abnormalities, HER2-zero/ERBB2 hemizygous deletion, and ERBB2 hyperamplification who respond favorably to anti-HER2 therapy. Collectively, these findings establish drPCR as a clinically feasible, standardized, and ultrafast HER2 testing method for improved prediction of anti-HER2 therapy response in patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.