Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913350›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2025

Phenotypical Differentiation of Tremor Using Time Series Feature Extraction and Machine Learning.

Verena Häring, Veronika Selzam, Juan Francisco Martin-Rodriguez, Petra Schwingenschuh, Gertrúd Tamás, Linda Köhler, Jan Raethjen, Steffen Paschen, Franziska Goltz, Eoin Mulroy and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Verena HäringDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7543-7540
Veronika SelzamDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3209-9360
Juan Francisco Martin-RodriguezUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurologia y Neurofisiologia Clinica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1392-8775
Petra SchwingenschuhDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-6824
Gertrúd TamásDepartment of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-3678
Linda KöhlerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6375-467X
Jan RaethjenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-1115
Steffen PaschenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-8332
Franziska GoltzDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-2857
Eoin MulroyDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-0592
Anna LatorreDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-5209
Pablo MirUnidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurologia y Neurofisiologia Clinica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-302X
Rick C HelmichDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4035-6573
Kailash P BhatiaDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8185-286X
Jens VolkmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9570-593X
Robert PeachDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-5825
Sebastian R SchreglmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-5808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical diagnosis of tremor disorders depends on the interpretation of subtle movement characteristics, signs, and symptoms. Given the absence of a universally accepted biomarker, differentiation between essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently proves to be non-trivial.

objectiveTo identify generalizable tremor characteristics to differentiate ET and PD using feature extraction and machine learning (ML).

methodsHand accelerometer recordings from 414 patients, clinically diagnosed at six academic centers, formed an exploratory (158 ET, 172 PD) and a validation dataset (30 ET, 54 PD). Established, standardized tremor characteristics were assessed for their cross-center accuracy and validity. Supervised ML was applied to massive higher-order feature extraction of the same recordings to achieve optimal stratification and mechanistic exploration.

resultsWhile classic tremor characteristics did not consistently differentiate between conditions across centers, the feature combination identified via our ML approach was successfully validated. In comparison with the tremor stability index (TSI), feature-based analysis provided better classification accuracy (81.8% vs. 70.4%), sensitivity (86.4% vs. 70.8%), and specificity (76.6% vs. 70.2%), substantially improving disease stratification. The interpretation of identified features indicates fundamentally different dynamics in tremor-generating circuits: while different discrete but stable signal states in PD indicate several central oscillators, signal characteristics in ET point towards a singular pacemaker.

conclusionThis study establishes the use of feature-based ML as a powerful method to explore accelerometry-derived tremor signals. The combination of hypothesis-free, data-driven analyses and a large, multicenter dataset represents a relevant step towards big data analysis in tremor disorders. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Essential TremorMachine LearningParkinson DiseaseTremorAccelerometryAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypebig dataessential tremorParkinson's diseasetremor analysis

Identifiers

PMID40913350
PMCPMC12710121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.