SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2026
Family Bereavement Support Interventions in Specialist Adult Palliative Care: A Rapid Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Family Bereavement Support Interventions in Specialist Adult Palliative Care: A Rapid Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Grief after the death of a close relative: a study of associated factors and perceptions of bereavement support.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- A nature-based intervention for bereaved friend and family cancer caregivers: a study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Family expectations of grief care from home health nurses: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo synthesise evidence on the impact of pre- and post-loss family support interventions on bereavement outcomes and families' perceptions of their usefulness and benefits in specialist palliative care.
designA rapid mixed-methods systematic review drawing on JBI and Cochrane guidance. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed using a meta-aggregation and narrative analysis approach combined with narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCE: We searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library and included articles published between 2004 and 2024 that evaluated pre- and post-loss family support in specialist adult palliative care and assessed bereavement outcomes.
resultsThe search yielded 3682 records. We included thirty-nine mostly moderate to high-quality studies (57% quantitative). Results suggest that pre-loss support, like family-focused interventions and communication during dying, may mitigate post-loss anxiety, depression and grief. Individual and group post-loss support interventions may reduce anxiety, distress and grief while improving well-being. Families desire individualised and comprehensive pre- and post-loss support, with few not needing or accepting it. Stigma associated with bereavement, support and barriers can hinder access.
conclusionIncluded studies demonstrated mixed effects of pre- and post-loss family support interventions, suggesting they are beneficial when accessible and tailored to family needs. High-quality intervention research assessing a broader range of family bereavement outcomes is needed. IMPACT: Palliative care nurses and other health professionals should tailor their care to family needs, start family support before patient death and ensure equitable access to bereavement services. Our results may guide palliative care professionals in designing effective, personalised and accessible services and policymakers in allocating resources for bereavement care. Findings highlight research needs, including investigating barriers to care and accessibility of services. High-quality research is needed to understand who benefits the most from health-promoting bereavement support and why. REPORTING
methodWe adhered to the PRISMA guideline. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient and Public Contribution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/36jeu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.