ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Comparison of 10-year follow-up result of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc diseases: risk factors for heterotopic ossification.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of hybrid surgeries for the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of skip-level ACDF vs. contiguous ACDF in the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Different Center of Rotation Trajectories after Cervical Hybrid Surgery: A Minimum 7-Year Retrospective Comparison of Bryan and Mobi-C Prostheses.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Is Motion Preservation With Three-Level Hybrid Cervical Surgery Achieved Without Compromising Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global spine journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the long-term clinical outcomes and radiographic findings between hybrid surgery (HS) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for three-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). And the incidence, prognosis, and potential risk factors of heterotopic ossification (HO) more than 10 years after Bryan prosthesis replacement in HS has been explored.
methodsFrom January 2007 to December 2014, a total of 46 patients who underwent either HS (n = 26) or ACDF (n = 20) for consecutive three-level CDDD were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiographic evaluations included cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 range of motion (C2-7 ROM), ROM of surgical segments (SROM), and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Potential risk factors for HO development at the 10-year follow-up after HS, including age, sex, ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL), and anterior vertebral osteophytes (AVO), were evaluated. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the predictive value of AVO for HO, including the area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff value. Spearman correlation was used to assess the relationship between ROM and ASD. Postoperative complications were also recorded.
resultsThe mean follow-up duration was 141.85 ± 17.20 months. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS, JOA, and NDI scores at 3 days postoperatively and at the final follow-up compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in these scores between the groups at any time point (P > 0.05). At the final follow-up, the HS group exhibited significantly greater C2-7 ROM and SROM compared to the ACDF group (P < 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in CL at postoperative day 3 compared to preoperative measurements (P < 0.05). At the 10-year follow-up, the incidence of ASD was lower in the HS group (53.85%) than in the ACDF group (75.00%), with a significant reduction in ASD severity (P < 0.05). A negative correlation between ROM and ASD was observed (P < 0.05). The rate of secondary surgeries was lower in the HS group (0% vs. 5.0%), though the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The overall prevalence of HO in the HS group was 26.92% (grades I-IV). Both sex and AVO were significantly associated with HO development, and multivariate analysis identified AVO as an independent risk factor (P < 0.05, β = 3.137). ROC curve analysis revealed that AVO had an AUC of 0.85 in predicting HO, with a cutoff value of 1.5.
conclusionsBoth HS and ACDF demonstrated favorable long-term clinical outcomes and effective reconstruction of cervical physiological curvature. However, HS better preserved cervical ROM. At the 10-year follow-up, HS demonstrated a trend toward a lower incidence of ASD compared to ACDF, and reduced the severity of progression of ASD. There was a trend toward fewer reoperation rates in HS. AVO proliferation was identified as a significant independent risk factor for HO after HS, whereas island-type OALL was not significantly associated with HO development. In clinical practice, preoperative evaluation of AVO in ACDR segments is essential to mitigate the risk of postoperative HO formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40913198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.