ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
An evaluation of the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in anatomy education.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedical students primarily learn anatomy through lectures and atlases. Since mastering anatomy requires spatial visualization, dissection of cadavers has traditionally been regarded as the most effective approach in this discipline. Unfortunately, there are many drawbacks to this method, including accessibility issues. Nowadays, the use of 3D printing and other advanced technologies as educational tools in anatomy courses has been on the rise and they can play an extremely beneficial role in this regard. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D printed anatomical models for student education. MATERIALS &
methodsThe selected anatomical models were scanned using a 3D scanner, taking into account their 3D features and their application in hands-on learning settings. Minor modifications were made to the scanned files with the help of computer software before they were printed. Ultimately, the models were assessed by faculty members and students from different disciplines.
resultsOnce the models were prepared, they were given to various groups, including professors, medical students, MSc anatomy students, surgery residents, and BSc radiology students for evaluation. The opinions of these groups were then compared across two sets of models, and their assessments were analyzed in various cases. The feedback from four groups of students i.e. medical students, MSc anatomy students, surgery residents, and BSc radiology students indicated a notable contrast with the feedback from the professors' group.
conclusion3D printed models serve as valuable resources for teaching and learning anatomy from diverse viewpoints, catering to learners at different levels of study. Nevertheless, despite the usefulness of 3D models, anatomy professors believe that natural specimens associated with cadavers remain the most essential teaching resource for anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40913166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.