Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913150›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of medical humanities2026

Distributed Response to Distributed Intervening: Making Sense of Public Digitalization Through Digital Support.

Stig Bo Andersen, Sofie Skovbæk, Aske Juul Lassen, Astrid Pernille Jespersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of medical humanities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stig Bo AndersenFaculty of Humanities, Saxo Institute, Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0923-3886
Sofie SkovbækFaculty of Humanities, Saxo Institute, Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2941-7012
Aske Juul LassenFaculty of Humanities, Saxo Institute, Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. ajlas@hum.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7569-5930
Astrid Pernille JespersenFaculty of Humanities, Saxo Institute, Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-1701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication and interaction with public authorities and healthcare professionals in Denmark primarily go through digital self-service platforms, requiring diverse skills and device access. In this article, we describe how senior citizens in Denmark handle and make sense of public digitalization through different forms of digital support. Through an ethnographic study of community-led initiatives of digital support, we highlight how senior citizens find socio-technical ways of managing digital obligations and argue that citizens' digital agency in day-to-day interactions with public digitalization relies heavily on distributed socio-material relations. We suggest that the ways of engaging with healthcare through digital means should be of increasing concern to medical humanities scholars, as digital literacies and technologies have become gatekeepers to welfare and healthcare. Drawing on Donna Haraway's reconceptualization of responsibility as response-ability, and Jane Bennett's notion of distributed agency, we argue that the ability of digital citizens to respond is a result of a distributed and combined responsiveness of human, technological, and digital actants. We point to two opposite but interrelated assemblages: public digital as distributed intervening mediated through computers, smartphones, tablets, public digital mail platforms, et cetera, and digital support as distributed response, which serves to mitigate and translate demands and obligations of the digitalized welfare state. Consequently, as digital developments tend to generate an increasingly individualizing gaze, medical humanities must be critically concerned with the manifold, subtle actants that co-constitute accessibility and responsiveness of patients and citizens.

Indexed as

CommunicationDigital TechnologyHumanitiesAnthropology, CulturalDenmarkHumansSmartphoneDenmarkDigital citizenshipDigitalizationDistributed agencyMedical humanitiesResponse-ability

Identifiers

PMID40913150
PMCPMC13032930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.