ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Clinical exome sequencing efficacy and phenotypic expansions involving non-isolated congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT+).
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized Medicine in Pediatric Urology: From Diagnosis to Individualized Risk Assessment.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Dose-Dependent and Non-Autonomous Signaling in CAKUT: A Lineage-Specific Framework from Conditional Knockout Studies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- From Genes to Malformations: Molecular Mechanisms Driving the Pathogenesis of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT) can occur in isolation or in conjunction with one or more non-CAKUT associated congenital anomalies or neurodevelopmental disorders (CAKUT+). A molecular cause is not identified in most individuals with CAKUT+. This is due, in part, to uncertainty regarding the efficacy of genetic testing and an incomplete understanding of the genes that cause CAKUT+. Here, we use data from 515 individuals with CAKUT+ (n = 500) or isolated CAKUT (n = 15) to determine the efficacy of clinical exome sequencing (cES) and to identify new phenotype expansions that involve CAKUT. We determined that cES established a molecular diagnosis in 27.4% (141/515) of individuals in this cohort. No statistically significant difference in efficacy was seen with regards to age, sex, CAKUT phenotype, or associated organ system abnormality. Only 3.5% (5/144) to 14.6% (21/144) of the individual diagnoses made in our cohort could have been identified using one of four clinically available CAKUT gene panels. We then used a machine-learning approach to confirm that PHIP is a CAKUT gene and to implicate ADNP and SETD5 genes associated with an increased risk of CAKUT. These findings lead us to conclude that cES should be considered in individuals with CAKUT+ for whom a molecular diagnosis has not been identified, that cES has the potential to identify many diagnoses in individuals with CAKUT+ that would be missed using a CAKUT gene panel, and that individuals with ADNP-, PHIP-, and SETD5-related disorders may present with CAKUT phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.