ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026
Transcriptional regulation in heart development, disease and regeneration: reassessing the fetal gene hypothesis.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immature and mature myocardium in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics uncovers endothelial progenitor-like remodelling driving human coronary atherosclerosis progression.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Control of Mammalian Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- A Proteoform-Resolved Atlas of Human Cardiac Histones.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central paradigm in cardiac biology is the reactivation of the fetal gene programme in the adult heart in response to stress. This so-called 'fetal gene hypothesis' was first proposed almost 40 years ago following the observation that certain fetal contractile protein isoforms were re-expressed in hypertrophied ventricles in the rodent heart in response to haemodynamic overload. Consequently, this concept was broadly adopted, and activation of the fetal gene programme became synonymous in the literature with the cardiac stress response. Transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling studies from the past 20 years have revealed the extent to which the diseased heart redeploys fetal gene programmes in response to stress. In this Review, we describe the historical origins of the fetal gene hypothesis and re-evaluate the general principles of fetal gene regulation in heart development, disease and regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40913064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.