ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
A generalist foundation model and database for open-world medical image segmentation.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segment any tumour: an uncertainty-aware vision foundation model for whole-body analysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Foundation models in biomedical imaging: turning hype into reality.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Language-Guided Segmentation of Medical Images: A Review of Foundation Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine-Learning Microfluidic Minute-Scale Microorganism Metrics Monitoring(M6).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- PAVSAT: an automated blood vessel analysis tool using deep learning-based segmentation and image processing.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Automated and quantitative segmentation of colorectal polyps via an information-guided deep learning network with boundary perception.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Transformer-Based Deep Learning for Population-Scale Retinal Image Screening of Ophthalmic Disorders.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Sensor-Oriented Multimodal Medical Data Acquisition and Modeling Framework for Tumor Grading and Treatment Response Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bioorthogonal optimized virus immuno-nanomedicine (BOVIN).Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision foundation models have demonstrated vast potential in achieving generalist medical segmentation capability, providing a versatile, task-agnostic solution through a single model. However, current generalist models involve simple pre-training on various medical data containing irrelevant information, often resulting in the negative transfer phenomenon and degenerated performance. Furthermore, the practical applicability of foundation models across diverse open-world scenarios, especially in out-of-distribution (OOD) settings, has not been extensively evaluated. Here we construct a publicly accessible database, MedSegDB, based on a tree-structured hierarchy and annotated from 129 public medical segmentation repositories and 5 in-house datasets. We further propose a Generalist Medical Segmentation model (MedSegX), a vision foundation model trained with a model-agnostic Contextual Mixture of Adapter Experts (ConMoAE) for open-world segmentation. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of MedSegX across a range of medical segmentation tasks. Experimental results indicate that MedSegX achieves state-of-the-art performance across various modalities and organ systems in in-distribution (ID) settings. In OOD and real-world clinical settings, MedSegX consistently maintains its performance in both zero-shot and data-efficient generalization, outperforming other foundation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40913057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.