Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913052›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning for the prediction of blood transfusion risk during or after mitral valve surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Yuhan Wang, Leping Liu, Kexin Fan, Yongjun Wang, Jiyan Zhang, Xianjun Ma, Yuanshuai Huang, Xinhua Wang, Bingyu Chen, Jinsong Zhang and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuhan Wang *Department of Transfusion, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Leping Liu *Department of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kexin Fan *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Transfusion, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiyan ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fuwai Hospital National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xianjun MaDepartment of Transfusion, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yuanshuai HuangDepartment of Transfusion, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Xinhua WangDepartment of Transfusion, Beijing Aerospace General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bingyu ChenDepartment of Transfusion, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jinsong ZhangDepartment of Medical Affairs, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. 1445098592@qq.com.
Rong GuiDepartment of Transfusion, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. guirong@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the optimal prediction method and key preoperative variables for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion risk in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. We conducted a retrospective study involving 1477 patients from eight large tertiary hospitals in China who underwent mitral valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. From thirty collected preoperative variables, the Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR) method was used for feature selection, and various machine learning models were evaluated. Of the 1477 patients, 862 received RBC transfusions. The mRMR method identified ten significant preoperative variables. The LightGBM model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.935 in the training set and 0.734 in the validation set, with 74.2% accuracy in a prospective dataset. SHAP analysis revealed the ten most influential variables were hematocrit, RBC count, weight, body mass index, fibrinogen, hemoglobin, height, age, left ventricular dilation, and sex. In conclusion, LightGBM was identified as the optimal model for predicting RBC transfusion needs. The model's high accuracy can assist clinicians in anticipating transfusions and improving blood management decisions.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionErythrocyte TransfusionMachine LearningMitral ValveAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsLightGBMMachine learningMitral valveRed blood cell transfusionSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID40913052
PMCPMC12413438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.