Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913042›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Ultrasound system for precise neuromodulation of human deep brain circuits.

Eleanor Martin, Morgan Roberts, Ioana F Grigoras, Olivia Wright, Tulika Nandi, Sebastian W Rieger, Jon Campbell, Tim den Boer, Ben T Cox, Charlotte J Stagg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Neuromodulation of the central nervous system for facial pain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eleanor Martin *Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-1180
Morgan Roberts *Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Ioana F Grigoras *Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5430-7919
Olivia Wright *Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Tulika Nandi *Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8161-3770
Sebastian W RiegerNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5414-645X
Jon CampbellNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-1655
Tim den BoerNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ben T CoxDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7296-4093
Charlotte J StaggNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, FMRIB, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. charlotte.stagg@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-5036
Bradley E TreebyDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. b.treeby@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7782-011X

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR203316RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P008712/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P008860/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/S026371/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 203139/A/16/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 203145/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 224430/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce an advanced transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) system for precise deep brain neuromodulation, featuring a 256-element helmet-shaped transducer array (555 kHz), stereotactic positioning, individualised planning, and real-time fMRI monitoring. Experiments demonstrated selective modulation of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and connected visual cortex regions. Participants showed significantly increased visual cortex activity during concurrent TUS and visual stimulation, with high cross-individual reproducibility. A theta-burst TUS protocol produced robust neuromodulatory effects, decreasing visual cortex activity for at least 40 min post-stimulation. Control experiments confirmed these effects were specific to the targeted LGN. Our findings reveal this system's potential to non-invasively modulate deep brain circuits with unprecedented precision and specificity, offering new avenues for studying brain function and developing targeted therapies for neurological and psychiatric disorders, with transformative potential for both research and clinical applications.

Indexed as

BrainDeep Brain StimulationGeniculate BodiesVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40913042
PMCPMC12413462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.