Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40912901›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of ophthalmology2026

Efficacy of spectacle lenses for myopia control: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Luca D'Andrea, Michele Rinaldi, Raffaele Piscopo, Fabiana Iorio, Simone La Padula, Sundas Maqsood, Mohamed Elalfy, Antonietta Melenzane, Filippo Confalonieri, Ozlem Ozkan and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Management of myopia: a mini-review.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca D'AndreaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy dandrea.luca91@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-4899
Michele RinaldiDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele PiscopoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabiana IorioDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Simone La PadulaDepartment of Public Health, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Sundas MaqsoodDepartment of Ophthalmology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, England, UK.
Mohamed ElalfyQueen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, East Grinstead, England, UK.
Antonietta MelenzaneDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Campania, Italy.
Filippo ConfalonieriDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Ozlem OzkanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Canan Asli UtineDokuz Eylul Universitesi Hastanesi, Izmir, Turkey.
Ciro CostagliolaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effects of advanced spectacle lens technologies on changes in spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) and axial length (AL) elongation in slowing down the progression of myopia in children and adolescents, by synthesising data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify all RCTs up to 27 February 2025 that compared intervention groups with myopia control lenses and control groups with standard single vision lenses (SVLs). Data from eligible studies were extracted into specially-designed data collection forms without changing the original values. Means and SD for continuous outcomes were determined and imported into RevMan.

resultsThis meta-analysis included 23 RCTs with a total of 13.315 subjects. Compared with SVLs, myopia control lenses significantly reduced AL (-0.15 mm; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.09; p<0.00001) and SER progression (-0.31 D; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.20; p<0.00001). Highly Aspherical Lenslet lenses significantly reduced AL (-0.28 mm; 95% CI -0.37 to -0.19) and SER progression (-0.52 D; 95% CI -0.84 to -0.20). Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments lenses also significantly reduced SER (-0.45 D; 95% CI -0.65 to -0.26), although only one eligible RCT reported AL data. Other lens types had modest or variable effects.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides an up-to-date and detailed comparative evaluation of spectacle lens designs for myopia control, based exclusively on RCTs. These findings support the use of specialty lenses as an effective, non-invasive strategy to reduce the risks associated with high-myopia and guide optimal lens selection in clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251009898.

Indexed as

EyeglassesMyopiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAdolescentAxial Length, EyeChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicOptics and RefractionPublic healthTreatment otherVision

Identifiers

PMID40912901
PMCPMC12911582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.