SynthesisThe British journal of ophthalmology2026
Efficacy of spectacle lenses for myopia control: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progression with myopia control spectacles: identifying predictors of response to defocus incorporated multiple segment and highly aspherical lenslets spectacles in the French myopia cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Comparative Effectiveness of Four Myopia-Control Spectacle Lenses: A Real-World AIPW Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of combining peripheral defocus spectacle lens wear with 0.01% atropine.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Neuro-ophthalmic review on pediatric myopia: Advancing from refraction to a brain-centric model of axial growth.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Control effect of dual-mechanism myopia control lenses on myopia in children and adolescents: a prospective, 12-month, non-randomized, parallel-controlled, and single-center trial protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Management of myopia: a mini-review.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the effects of advanced spectacle lens technologies on changes in spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) and axial length (AL) elongation in slowing down the progression of myopia in children and adolescents, by synthesising data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify all RCTs up to 27 February 2025 that compared intervention groups with myopia control lenses and control groups with standard single vision lenses (SVLs). Data from eligible studies were extracted into specially-designed data collection forms without changing the original values. Means and SD for continuous outcomes were determined and imported into RevMan.
resultsThis meta-analysis included 23 RCTs with a total of 13.315 subjects. Compared with SVLs, myopia control lenses significantly reduced AL (-0.15 mm; 95% CI -0.20 to -0.09; p<0.00001) and SER progression (-0.31 D; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.20; p<0.00001). Highly Aspherical Lenslet lenses significantly reduced AL (-0.28 mm; 95% CI -0.37 to -0.19) and SER progression (-0.52 D; 95% CI -0.84 to -0.20). Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments lenses also significantly reduced SER (-0.45 D; 95% CI -0.65 to -0.26), although only one eligible RCT reported AL data. Other lens types had modest or variable effects.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides an up-to-date and detailed comparative evaluation of spectacle lens designs for myopia control, based exclusively on RCTs. These findings support the use of specialty lenses as an effective, non-invasive strategy to reduce the risks associated with high-myopia and guide optimal lens selection in clinical practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251009898.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.