ArticleOpen heart2025
Clinical impact of mean pulmonary arterial pressure after balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical research on pulmonary hypertension from a 2025 perspective: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improves haemodynamics in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Previous studies on BPA have set the treatment objective to achieve a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <30 mm Hg. However, the clinical impact of mPAP after BPA remains unclear. This study aimed to stratify patients according to their mPAP after BPA and evaluate its association with clinical status and long-term outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with inoperable CTEPH (median age, 72 (61 to 79) years) who underwent BPA and follow-up right heart catheterisation. Patients were categorised by mPAP after BPA: ≤20, >20-<30 and ≥30 mm Hg groups.
resultsThe WHO functional classification, 6 min walk distance and right ventricular ejection fraction were significantly better in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p=0.007, p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Additionally, the proportions of patients who required pulmonary vasodilators or oxygen therapy were significantly lower in the group with a lower mPAP (trend test p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Across all multivariable models, the mPAP ≥30 mm Hg group had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg group. In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the mPAP ≤20 mm Hg and >20-<30 mm Hg groups.
conclusionsIn patients with CTEPH after BPA, an mPAP of <30 mm Hg was associated with a favourable prognosis, and patients with an mPAP of ≤20 mm Hg presented with better symptoms, exercise capacity, right ventricular function and more withdrawal from oxygen therapy and pulmonary vasodilators. The BPA treatment goal may require individual adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.