ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2025
Guidelines for diet-induced models of cardiometabolic syndrome.
Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chamber-Specific Structural, Fibrotic, and Molecular Remodeling of the Heart in Experimental Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Transcriptional Heterogeneity of Cardiac Remodeling Between Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Capsaicin for cardiometabolic syndrome: multitarget mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS) encompasses a cluster of metabolic abnormalities, including obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, that collectively increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Animal models are widely used to study CMS, with diet-induced models being the most physiologically relevant. A lack of reporting standards and variability in dietary composition, feeding duration, and macronutrient content across studies hinder reproducibility assessment and translational impact evaluation. We provide standardized guidelines for the consideration, preparation, and use of diets in experimental models of CMS. Advantages and limitations of different diet-induced models are compared with genetic and pharmacological approaches, emphasizing replicability to human metabolic dysregulation. Key components include macronutrient composition, fat source selection, feeding duration, strain susceptibility, and sex differences. In addition, we outline husbandry practices, including environmental factors, bedding material, and enrichment conditions, which can affect metabolic outcomes. Standardization is essential for enhancing experimental reproducibility and facilitating cross-study comparisons. These guidelines serve as a framework for researchers to optimize dietary interventions in CMS models, improving the predictive value of preclinical findings for translational applications to aid in the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.