Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40912639›Full record

ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2025

Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Grafts are Less Likely to be Abandoned Compared to Autogenous Fistulas Despite a Higher Reintervention Rate.

Nyah Patel, Alik Farber, Elizabeth King, Mahmoud Malas, Andrea Alonso, Vipul Chitalia, Saran Lotfollahzadeh, Jesse A Columbo, Philip P Goodney, Jeffrey J Siracuse and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nyah PatelDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Division of Vascular Surgery, Jacobs Medical Center at University of California San Diego Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.
Alik FarberDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Elizabeth KingDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Mahmoud MalasDivision of Vascular Surgery, Jacobs Medical Center at University of California San Diego Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.
Andrea AlonsoDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Vipul ChitaliaRenal Section, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA; Institute of Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Saran LotfollahzadehRenal Section, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA; Institute of Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Jesse A ColumboSection of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.
Philip P GoodneySection of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.
Jeffrey J SiracuseDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA. Electronic address: Jeffrey.Siracuse@bmc.org.
Vascular Quality Initiative, Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network

Funding

Disease-specific risk factors for thrombosis following vascular interventionsR01HL166608 · NHLBI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI Vipul C Chitalia, KATYA RAVID · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
Mechanisms of drug-coated balloon therapyR01HL159620 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOLACHALAMA, VIJAYA B. · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Comparative-Effectiveness of Procedures for Carotid RevascularizationK08HL165087 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI Jesse A Columbo · 2023 to 2026
$587k
Role of intravascular ultrasound in Central Venous Stenosis in ESRD patientsR21DK119740 · NIDDK · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHITALIA, VIPUL C · 2020 to 2021
$503k
Frequency domain shortwave infrared spectroscopy (FD-SWIRS) for volume status monitoring during hemodialysis in end stage kidney diseaseR21DK132784 · NIDDK · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHITALIA, VIPUL C, ROBLYER, DARREN MICHAEL · 2022 to 2023
$478k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL165087NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159620NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166608NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK119740NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK132784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpper-extremity arteriovenous (AV) access often requires reintervention. However, the frequency of reinterventionsand subsequent access failure is not well-characterized. Our goal was to evaluate the frequency and type of reinterventions, risk-factors, and outcomes after AV access creation.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of index upper extremity AV access creations (2017-2019) within the VQI Medicare-linked Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network dataset for patients on hemodialysis (HD). Reinterventionswere defined as open or endovascular procedures on the access occurring at 1 day or more after access creation. Access abandonment was defined as any new access creation, peritoneal dialysis, kidney transplant, or death following index access creation. Univariable, multivariable, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses were performed.

resultsThere were 2,551 patients with an index AV graft (AVG) (19.5%) or AV fistula (AVF) (80.5%). Patients who underwent an AVG were more likely older, female sex, of non-White race, nonambulatory, not living at home, and to undergo the procedure as an inpatient (P < 0.05). Reintervention rates were 1.64/person-year for AVG and 1.17/person-year for AVF. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, freedom from new AV access creation at 3 years was 72% for AVG and 78% for AVF (P < 0.001). Freedom from tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) placement at 3 years was 66% for AVG and 71% for AVF (P = 0.19). On multivariable analysis, undergoing placement of an AVG was independently associated with an increased risk of any reintervention compared to AVF (rate ratio (RR) 1.40 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-1.6; P = <0.001). TDC placement was increasingly associated with each subsequent reintervention but did not vary by access type. There was an elevated risk of access abandonment with subsequent reinterventions; however, long-term access abandonment was lower with an AVG compared to an AVF (RR 0.82 95% CI 0.7-0.96; P = 0.015).

conclusionReinterventions to support HD access are common, and more than 60% of patients required at least one procedure within the first year of access placement. While patients with AVG require more reinterventions, they also have a lower rate of long-term access abandonment and similar rates of TDC placement compared to patients who receive an AVF.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationRenal DialysisUpper ExtremityAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID40912639
PMCPMC12752451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.