ArticleSLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D2025
Integrating AUROC and SSMD for quality control in high-throughput screening assays.
Article in SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CytokineProfile: An Integrated Web Tool for Cytokine Profiling Analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput screening (HTS) assays are pivotal in modern biomedical research, particularly in drug discovery and functional genomics. Ensuring the quality and reliability of HTS data is critical, especially when dealing with the small sample sizes that are typical in such assays. This study explores the integration of two powerful statistical metrics-Strictly Standardized Mean Difference (SSMD) and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC)-for quality control (QC) in HTS. SSMD offers a standardized, interpretable measure of effect size, while AUROC provides a threshold-independent assessment of discriminative power. By establishing the theoretical and empirical relationships between AUROC and SSMD, we demonstrate how these metrics complement each other and enhance QC practices. We provide parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric estimation methods, and demonstrate the utility of the integrated framework in real HTS datasets. Our findings support the joint application of SSMD and AUROC as a robust and interpretable approach to improving QC in HTS, particularly under constraints of limited sample sizes of positive and negative controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.