ReviewMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2025
State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.
Review in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residue-Level Determination of Small-Molecule-Protein Affinities by Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Consensus statement on mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of cardiac tissue.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Extracellular matrix polysaccharides and glycoproteins in ovarian cancer: structural-functional macromolecular perspectives and potential exosome-derived biomarkers.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Advancing DIA-Based Limited Proteolysis Workflows: Introducing DIA-LiPA.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural proteomics has undergone a profound transformation, driven by the convergence of advanced experimental methodologies and computational innovations. Cutting-edge mass spectrometry (MS)-based approaches, including cross-linking MS (XL-MS), hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS (HDX-MS), and limited proteolysis MS (LiP-MS), now enable unprecedented insights into protein topology, conformational dynamics, and protein-protein interactions. These methods, complemented by affinity purification (AP), co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), proximity labeling (PL), and spatial proteomics techniques, have expanded our ability to characterize the structural proteome at a systems-wide scale. Integration with electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM), cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, and small-angle X-ray/neutron scattering (SAXS/SANS) methods has further driven the field of integrative structural biology. These methods, in conjunction with AI-driven predictive models such as AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold, enable the high-resolution modeling of protein complexes and dynamic assemblies, bridging the gap between static structures and real-time conformational changes. This review explores the current state-of-the-art in structural proteomics, with a focus on methodological advances and the integration of XL-MS, HDX-MS, and LiP-MS with methods in structural biology. We further discuss the application of structural proteomics in deciphering disease mechanisms, identifying therapeutic targets, and guiding drug discovery, with these techniques poised to revolutionize precision medicine. Future directions emphasize fully integrative, multimodal approaches that unify experimental and computational paradigms, fostering a holistic understanding of the human proteome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.