ArticleOphthalmology. Glaucoma
Widefield OCT Angiography and Euclidian Distance Analysis of Microvascular Deficits in Glaucomatous Eyes.
Article in Ophthalmology. Glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate superficial microvascular deficits of glaucomatous eyes with widefield OCT angiography (OCTA) and Euclidian distance (ED) analysis.
designCross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Swept-source OCTA (SS-OCTA) images of healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
methodsTwelve-by-twelve mm scans of healthy and glaucomatous eyes were acquired with SS-OCTA (PLEX Elite 9000, ZEISS). The en face images of the superficial retina segmentation were exported and analyzed with ImageJ software. A fixed threshold that predicted the size of the foveal avascular zone was used to generate binarized images with vascular (white) or deficient (black) pixels. Four vascular parameters were measured within a macula-centered 9 × 10.8 mm ellipse: vascular density (VD), average ED (ED
main outcome measuresVascular density, ED
conclusionsVascular density, ED, and NPD were worse in glaucomatous compared to healthy eyes throughout the widefield OCTA image. High ED and NPD values accentuate regions of inadequate perfusion. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.