SynthesisJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2026
The cardiovascular impact of chronic venous disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is chronic venous disease a marker of systemic cardiovascular risk? A systematic review.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- The Wound-Heart Axis: Can Chronic Wounds Contribute to Cardiac Dysfunction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The arterial-venous continuum: bridging atherosclerosis and chronic venous disease through endothelial dysfunction.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Concomitant Venous Disease in Patients with Advanced Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Patient- and Limb-Level Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A new challenging dilemma to prevent major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic venous disorders.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the association between chronic venous disease (CVD) and cardiovascular (CV) risk, including major CV events and traditional risk factors, across diverse populations and study designs.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 2011 to March 2025 using Medical Subject Headings terms and free-text keywords. Inclusion criteria encompassed observational human studies evaluating the relationship between CVD and CV outcomes or risk factors. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Thematic analysis and coding of extracted data were supported using ATLAS.ti software. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, including cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control designs.
resultsSeventeen of the 20 studies (85%) reported a significant association between CVD and at least one CV outcome, such as coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, or CV mortality. Odds and hazard ratios ranged from 1.3 to 3.8, with higher Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Physiological classes (C3-C6) consistently linked with greater CV risk. Eight studies identified greater higher prevalence of traditional risk factors-including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia-in patients with CVD. Two studies provided mechanistic insights, highlighting systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction as potential shared pathways. Population-based analyses with multivariable adjustments confirmed the independent nature of the association. A meta-analysis of six studies encompassing 393,875 individuals and 55,356 CV events was conducted. The pooled odds ratio for CV events in patients with CVD was 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.69), reaching statistical significance (P = .021). An adjusted expected odds ratio of 2.50 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-5.44) further reinforced the strength of the association. Heterogeneity was high (I
conclusionsCVD is independently associated with increased CV morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with moderate to severe disease. These findings suggest that CVD may serve as a clinical marker of systemic vascular dysfunction and support its inclusion in CV risk assessment frameworks. The quantitative synthesis confirms a significant association and highlights the importance of early CV screening in patients with CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.