ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2026
Fully automated image updating for brain shift compensation after dural opening.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn open cranial procedures, intraoperative brain shift can degrade the accuracy of surgical navigation on the basis of preoperative MR (pMR) images as soon as the cortical surface is exposed. The aim of this study was to develop a fully automated image updating system to address brain shift at the start of open cranial surgery and to evaluate its accuracy and efficiency.
methodsThis study included patients undergoing open cranial procedures at a single center. Intraoperative stereovision (iSV) images of the surgical field were acquired as an easily integrated nondisruptive source of high-resolution image data on surgical surface deformation and were integrated with a computational model to compensate for volumetric brain shift after dural opening by updating the coregistered preoperative images. A Fast Segment Anything Model algorithm segmented the exposed cortical surface on iSV images automatically. Vessel and sulcus features were also segmented automatically from both iSV and pMR images and registered using a two-step registration method. Extracted nonrigid cortical displacements were assimilated by a finite element model to estimate whole-brain deformation. Updated MR (uMR) images were generated by deforming pMR by the resulting displacement field. A tracked stylus sampled the exposed cortical surface to provide independent measurements for error assessments. The uMR images were evaluated in terms of the misfit between model estimates and measured displacements, target registration error (TRE), and point-to-surface distance (PSD) relative to their pMR counterparts.
resultsFifteen patients (age range 45-85 years) who underwent open cranial procedures were included in the study. The overall accuracy of reconstructed iSV surfaces relative to stylus positions was 0.8 ± 0.7 mm. The overall mean misfit, TRE, and PSD of uMR images were 2.1 ± 1.2 mm, 1.9 ± 1.0 mm, and 1.6 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, compared with 6.5 ± 1.3 mm, 6.2 ± 1.2 mm, and 4.5 ± 1.2 mm for pMR images. Image updating was completed automatically without any user intervention in an overall mean of 3.9 ± 0.6 minutes.
conclusionsAutomatic image updating compensated for brain shift due to dural opening and achieved clinically acceptable accuracy and efficiency. The system required no user intervention or expertise and caused minimal interruptions to surgical flow, suggesting it has potential for future integration into open cranial procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.