ArticlePloS one2025
Artificial vision models for the identification of Mediterranean flora: An analysis in four ecosystems.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object identification has been widely used in several applications, utilising the annotated data with bounding boxes to specify each object's exact location and category in images and videos. However, relatively little research has been conducted on identifying plant species in their natural environments. Natural habitats play a crucial role in preserving biodiversity, ecological balance, and overall ecosystem health. So, effective monitoring of habitats is necessary for safeguarding them, and one way of doing this is by identifying the typical and early warning plant species. Our study quantitatively evaluates the performance of six popular object detection models on our dataset collected in the wild, comprising various plant species from four habitats: screes, dunes, grasslands, and forests. The dataset employed in this work includes the data collected by human operators and the quadrupedal robot ANYmal C. The pre-trained object detection models have been chosen for experiments, and they are fine-tuned on our dataset to achieve better performance. These models incorporate two one-stage (RetinaNet and YOLOv8n), two two-stage (Faster RCNN and Cascade RCNN), and two transformer-based detectors (DETR and Deformable DETR). Extensive experimentation has been performed on the four habitat datasets by applying class balancing and hyperparameter tuning, and the obtained results are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.