ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Unlocking the power of L1 regularization: A novel approach to taming overfitting in CNN for image classification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-06-23Concerns/Issues about Article · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) stand as indispensable tools in deep learning, capable of autonomously extracting crucial features from diverse data types. However, the intricacies of CNN architectures can present challenges such as overfitting and underfitting, necessitating thoughtful strategies to optimize their performance. In this work, these issues have been resolved by introducing L1 regularization in the basic architecture of CNN when it is applied for image classification. The proposed model has been applied to three different datasets. It has been observed that incorporating L1 regularization with different coefficient values has distinct effects on the working mechanism of CNN architecture resulting in improving its performance. In MNIST digit classification, L1 regularization (coefficient: 0.01) simplifies feature representation and prevents overfitting, leading to enhanced accuracy. In the Mango Tree Leaves dataset, dual L1 regularization (coefficient: 0.001 for convolutional and 0.01 for dense layers) improves model interpretability and generalization, facilitating effective leaf classification. Additionally, for hand-drawn sketches like those in the Quick, Draw! Dataset, L1 regularization (coefficient: 0.001) refines feature representation, resulting in improved recognition accuracy and generalization across diverse sketch categories. These findings underscore the significance of regularization techniques like L1 regularization in fine-tuning CNNs, optimizing their performance, and ensuring their adaptability to new data while maintaining high accuracy. Such strategies play a pivotal role in advancing the utility of CNNs across various domains, further solidifying their position as a cornerstone of deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.