ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Reliance on migrant healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: A critical discourse analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The UK National Health Service (NHS) has relied on Migrant Healthcare workers (M-HCWs) since its inception. These M-HCWs have typically come from Low and Middle-Income countries (LMICs) and particularly, countries that were previously under British colonial rule. Despite this, medical workforce shortages persist in the NHS and there has been a lack of policy consensus about how best to ameliorate it. In June 2021, Baroness Dido Harding made an ultimately unsuccessful pitch to lead the NHS. During this period she made a statement where she expressed an ambition to reduce reliance on M-HCWs that was met with controversy in the general and medical press. This Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) examines the responses published in newspaper, media and journal articles in the month following Baroness Harding's statement. The dataset includes a variety of opinions about medical migration and M-HCWs and explores how language is connected to power and knowledge constructed and the effects of these discourses. It draws on theoretical approaches derived from the philosopher Michel Foucault and the postcolonial analyst Edward Said. A total of 48 articles were included in the final dataset which highlighted two main strands of discourse. The first strand is dominant and dissents against Baroness Dido Harding herself, her position, and her statement, predominantly on the grounds that it undermines historic and ongoing contributions of M-HCWs to the NHS. The second strand, which is notable in its relative absence, supports the implications of reducing reliance on M-HCWs. We identified a dominant discourse of support for M-HCWs based on their valuable contributions to the NHS. However, the relative absence of the second strand suggests a marginalisation of debate about the reliance on migration pathways which were often founded on colonial roots, the exacerbation of brain-drain from the Global South, and the inequities that this perpetuates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.