ArticlePloS one2025
Iterative rolling difference-Z-score and machine learning imputation for wind turbine foundation monitoring.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In engineering structure performance monitoring, capturing real-time on-site data and conducting precise analysis are critical for assessing structural condition and safety. However, equipment instability and complex on-site environments often lead to data anomalies and gaps, hindering accurate performance evaluation. This study, conducted within a wind farm reinforcement project in Shandong Province, addresses these challenges by focusing on anomaly detection and data imputation for weld nail strain, anchor cable axial force, and concrete strain. We propose an innovative iterative rolling difference-Z-score method for anomaly detection and a machine learning-based imputation framework combining linear interpolation with LightGBM. Experimental results show that the iterative rolling difference-Z-score method detects single-point and clustered anomalies with a Z-score threshold of 4, achieving robust performance even with 80% data loss. The imputation framework maintains low mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0214-0.0227 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.14-0.15 for continuous missing data scenarios (60-200 points), with reliable reconstruction up to 50% data loss. This research provides a robust solution for ensuring the precision and integrity of wind farm monitoring data, enhancing long-term structural reliability in renewable energy applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.