ArticlePloS one2025
Seismic random noise separation and suppression based on improved variational mode decomposition via grey wolf optimization.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seismic noise separation and suppression is an important topic in seismic signal processing to improve the quality of seismic data recorded at monitoring stations. We propose a novel seismic random noise suppression method based on enhanced variational mode decomposition (VMD) with grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm, which applies the envelope entropy to evaluate the wolf individual fitness, determine the grey wolf hierarchy, and obtain the optimized key elements K and α in VMD. Then, the decomposed effective intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) are extracted to separate and suppress random noises. It is worth to be noted that the Kurtosis comparison method can select the IMFs ensuring to preserve valid seismic signal. Finally, the denoised seismic signal is restored by the effective IMFs. The experimental results from synthetic and real field seismic data show that compared with several denoising methods, the proposed method can obtain higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with increasement of 27.78% and lower root mean square error (RMSE) with improvements of 78.82% under the same level of structural similarity (SSIM) which prove the validity and effectiveness of the GWO-VMD method for both separating random noise and preserving valid seismic signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.