ArticlePloS one2025
The role of intrinsic motivation in sustaining citizen science participation among diverse participants in a corporate volunteer program.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citizen science enables volunteers from the public to contribute to scientific research. While citizen science may be an avenue for "democratizing" science and facilitating learning among volunteers, projects tend to attract homogeneous volunteers already highly engaged in science. The emergence of facilitator organizations such as schools, churches and corporations, that connect existing volunteer-oriented groups with citizen science, offers a potentially viable avenue through which to attract more diverse volunteers, with more to gain from their experience. However, attracting and retaining these volunteers requires a detailed understanding of their motivations, and how different types of motivations might facilitate sustained, impactful experiences. The objective of this study was to evaluate the motivations, engagement, and diversity of citizen science volunteers recruited through a corporate volunteer program. We assessed these outcomes using digital participation metadata and a survey of 388 employee volunteers. Over the course of three years (2019-2022), this program enabled over 13,000 volunteers to contribute approximately 31,000 hours to 49 citizen science projects, though approximately half of volunteers participated only once. Survey results indicated that most volunteers (85%) were new to citizen science, and were more representative of the general US population in terms of their race/ethnicity, gender and educational attainment than typical citizen scientists. Volunteers' motivations were primarily self-determined (i.e., intrinsic). Less self-determined (i.e., extrinsic) motivations, like a sense of obligation or group pressure, were linked to lower levels of participation in the program. In addition, socio-demographic factors (race/ethnicity and age) were associated with differing levels of participation. In conclusion, volunteers from facilitator organizations can make significant contributions to citizen science and reshape citizen science into a more diverse and inclusive pursuit. However, sustained engagement by these volunteers relies in part on volunteers participating for intrinsic reasons. To facilitate self-determined motivation, projects should meet volunteers' needs for competence, relatedness and autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.