Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911553›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Challenges in higher education: Differences between students with and without specific learning disorder and the moderating role of executive functions.

Marlyn Khouri, Atheer Massarwe, Noga Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marlyn KhouriDepartment of Special Education, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-7963
Atheer MassarweDepartment of Special Education, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4603-0354
Noga CohenDepartment of Special Education, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students with Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) face difficulties not only in academic skills but also in the social, emotional, and executive function (EF) domains. These challenges may increase vulnerability to rumination-a repetitive and maladaptive focus on distress, which is strongly linked to emotional difficulties. This study explores differences in academic, social, emotional, and EF challenges between students with and without SLD and investigates whether these challenges moderate the relationship between SLD and rumination. A sample of 95 college students (46 with SLD, 49 without SLD) completed questionnaires assessing rumination and emotional distress. They also completed a writing task in which they provided an upsetting event related to their studies. The event were coded to four categories related to students' challenges: academic, social, emotional, and EF challenges. Results indicated that students with SLD reported significantly higher levels of rumination, greater EF challenges, and higher levels of perceived stress than their peers. A moderation analysis further revealed that EF difficulties significantly moderated the link between SLD and rumination, with students experiencing both SLD and EF challenges showing the highest rumination levels. Findings emphasize the critical role of EF in the emotional experiences of students with SLD. Addressing EF deficits among students with SLD can reduce emotional distress and improve academic outcomes.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionSpecific Learning DisorderStudentsAdolescentAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleRumination, CognitiveStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40911553
PMCPMC12412975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.