ArticlePloS one2025
Genetic and economic efficiencies of alternative breeding schemes for improvement of local breeds in low-input production systems: The case of the Farta sheep in Northwest Ethiopia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Designing and implementing a sound breeding program is essential for sustainably improving livestock productivity. This study evaluated the efficiencies of three breeding schemes for sustainable genetic improvement of indigenous sheep in low-input production systems. The schemes were one-stage selection at six months (Scheme I) or yearling age (Scheme II) and two-stage selections with the first at six months and the second at the yearling age (Scheme III). Each scheme was assessed with three levels of selection proportions (5%, 10% and 20%) and four flock sizes (600, 1200, 1800 and 2400 breeding ewes). Selection responses were simulated using a deterministic approach employed in the SelAction software. For six-month weight, the annual predicted genetic gains ranged from 0.177 to 0.267 kg (Scheme I) and 0.157 to 0.233 kg (Scheme III). For yearling weight, simulated annual genetic gains were 0.268 to 0.399 kg (Scheme II) and 0.265 to 0.398 kg (Scheme III). The expected annual genetic gains for the number of lambs weaned per ewe bred (NLW) and fertility rate were generally small, but the estimates in Schemes II and III were higher compared to Scheme I. The annual economic responses estimated for Schemes I, II, and III ranged from US$0.393 to 0.591, 0.589 to 0.879 and 0.494 to 0.744, respectively. Notably, Scheme II yielded 34% and 16% higher economic returns than Schemes I and III, respectively. The results also revealed that varying the selection proportion significantly influenced the annual selection response, index accuracy, and inbreeding rate. Increasing the flock size had little effect on the genetic progress but significantly reduced the inbreeding rate. Given its genetic and economic benefits alongside operational feasibility, Scheme II, with a 5% selection proportion and a flock size of 1200 breeding ewes, is appropriate for the genetic improvement of indigenous sheep in low-input systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.