Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40911472›Full record

Observational studyAnesthesia and analgesia2026

The Influence of Vasopressor-Induced Arterial Blood Pressure Elevation on Muscle-Recorded Motor Evoked Potentials.

Sebastiaan E Dulfer, Rob J M Groen, Fiete Lange, Katalin Tamasi, Frits H Wapstra, Lilian M Mennink, Bianca M Dijkstra, Thouraya J Dil, Christopher Faber, Anthony R Absalom and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sebastiaan E DulferFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rob J M GroenFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Fiete LangeDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Katalin TamasiDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Frits H WapstraDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Lilian M MenninkFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bianca M DijkstraFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Thouraya J DilDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Christopher FaberDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anthony R AbsalomDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marko M SahinovicDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gea DrostFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial electrical stimulation muscle-recorded motor evoked potentials (Tc-mMEPs) are used to monitor the spinal cord motor tracts during spinal surgery. There is considerable intra- and interindividual variability in the signals recorded, causing a high incidence of false positive warnings. Inadequate blood pressure is commonly blamed for false positive warnings and is usually managed with fluid and vasopressor therapy. The aim of the study was to systematically investigate the effects of norepinephrine and ephedrine-induced arterial blood pressure elevation on Tc-mMEPs.

methodsTwenty-five patients undergoing spinal surgery were included in this prospective observational study. After anesthetic induction and positioning, but before incision, a norepinephrine infusion was used to increase the mean arterial pressure (MAP) from approximately 60 to 100 mm Hg. Tc-mMEP amplitudes and area under the curves (AUC) were recorded from the abductor hallucis (AH), tibialis anterior (TA), and hand muscles every 2 minutes. Voltage thresholds of the AH, TA, and hand muscles were determined at MAP values of 60, 80, and 100 mm Hg. The primary objective was to determine the effects of increasing the MAP with a vasopressor infusion on Tc-mMEP amplitude, AUC, and threshold. For the secondary objective, the outcomes were adjusted for depth of anesthesia and propofol concentrations. Post hoc analyses included adjusting for confounders, noradrenaline infusion rate, and use of ephedrine, investigating the effects of cardiac index on Tc-mMEP characteristics, investigating the influence of increasing MAP on the excitability of the peripheral nervous system, and investigating the effects of MAP on BIS.

resultsIn the AH, TA, and hand muscles, Tc-mMEP amplitudes and AUC were significantly associated with MAP ( P < .02). A 10 mm Hg increase of the MAP was associated with a 11.0% to 17.7% increase in the amplitude and a 10.5% to 16.8% increase in the AUC. When adjusting for BIS, propofol concentrations, and use of ephedrine, MAP remained only significantly associated with the Tc-mMEP amplitude ( P = .002) and AUC ( P = .003) of the AH muscles. The influence of cardiac index on Tc-mMEP amplitude and AUC provided similar results when compared to the influence of MAP on Tc-mMEP amplitude and AUC. No influence of increasing MAP on the excitability of the peripheral nervous system was found. Increasing MAP significantly increased BIS values, even when corrected for propofol concentrations.

conclusionsElevation of MAP is associated with significantly higher Tc-mMEP amplitudes, AUCs, and lower voltage threshold. When corrected for BIS, propofol concentration, and use of ephedrine, the associations between increasing MAP and Tc-mMEP characteristics were largely attenuated. BIS values significantly increased by increasing MAP, when corrected for propofol concentration. Thereby, our results imply that increasing MAP increases the cortical excitability.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureEphedrineEvoked Potentials, MotorIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMuscle, SkeletalNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeProspective StudiesTranscranial Direct Current StimulationEphedrineNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID40911472
PMCPMC12959597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.