ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
Does affective touch buffer emotional distress? Insights from subjective and physiological indices.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Effects of Mindfulness Combined with Gratitude Touch on Anxiety, Depression, and Stress: A 12-Month Portable EEG-Based Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- From Molecules to Meaning: Integrating Neuropeptides, Sociostasis, and Hormesis in the Brain-Heart Axis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Affective tactile stimulation ameliorates chronic pain and comorbid anxiety by modulating hippocampal CA1 oscillations and functional connectivity.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affective touch, mediated by the activation of C-tactile afferents, has the potential to modulate affective states and physiological responses in situations of emotional distress across the lifespan. The present study aims to disentangle psychophysiological mechanisms supporting autonomic and emotional self-regulation, focusing on the possible buffering role of affective touch. Childless adult participants (N = 92) were presented with videos of an infant babbling (positive scene) and an infant crying (emotionally negative scene), followed by a tactile stimulation that was either affective (brushing) or non-affective (tapping). We collected subjective measures of affective state (valence and arousal) and physiological measures: heart rate (HR), HR variability (root mean square of successive differences [RMSSD] index), and stress index (SI). Participants reported a decrease in pleasantness and an increase in arousal during the crying video. Moreover, participants receiving affective touch showed an overall greater increase in pleasantness. At the physiological level, tactile stimulations elicited HR deceleration, reduction of SI, and return to baseline levels of RMSSD after emotional activation. These responses were more prominent in the affective touch group, suggesting that affective touch is effective in decreasing sympathetic activity and increasing vagal dominance. Our results indicate that affective touch may play a central role in autonomic and affective regulation, possibly buffering emotional distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.