ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2026
AI-Based QRS Onset Detection in the Early Ventricular Activation Site ECGs.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the onset of the QRS complex is an important step for localizing the site of origin (SOO) of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and the exit site of Ventricular Tachycardia (VT). However, identifying the QRS onset is challenging due to signal noise, baseline wander, motion artifact, and muscle artifact. Furthermore, in VT, QRS onset detection is especially difficult due to the overlap with repolarization from the prior beat. In this study, 7706 captured bipolar pacing beats (Stim-QRS < 40 ms) pooled from 384 anatomically widely dispersed pacing sites of 15 patients were used for an attention-based Swin-Unet neural network. We also utilized a self-supervised pretraining technique using 88253 unannotated ECG records. The algorithm correctly identified most of the onsets for ECG signals with bipolar pacing-site ECG dataset, achieving a sensitivity of 0.958 and a 1.924 ± 4.275 milliseconds prediction error. Our algorithm also achieved a prediction error of 1.518 ± 8.702 milliseconds for the QT Database (QTDB), and a prediction error of 1.333 ± 7.575 milliseconds for the Lobachevsky University Electrocardiography Database (LUDB) public datasets. We also achieved high inter-dataset performance, which supports the practical performance of the method, with a sensitivity of 0.927 for QTDB and a sensitivity of 0.981 for LUDB. The AI model achieves accurate onset detection in paced ECGs with spike-removed inputs, providing a controlled, high-fidelity training setting for future efforts in generalizing to VT ECGs. The use of self-supervised pretraining further improves the detector's accuracy, showcasing the applicability of the approach and using unannotated ECG signals for downstream tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.