ReviewThe Journal of physiology2026
The cardiac pacemakers: A paradigm of robustness in evolutionary biology.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- How physiology solves the gene-centric impasse.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Sinoatrial Node Impulses Emerge From Unique Synchronization Processing Solutions of Partially Stochastic Local Calcium Signals.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026Article
- There are more things in heaven and Earth than we dream of in our physiology.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- The principles of systems biology.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cardiac pacemaker activity is formed from multiple interlocking physiological networks, any one of which can generate rhythm. The interlocking is reciprocal so that they automatically replace each other. In such interlocking control systems, the association scores for individual components are necessarily low, even though causation, measured by the electric current carried by the relevant ion channels, is large. This kind of reciprocally based robustness is widespread in living organisms, which explains why most association scores in genome-wide association studies are low, or even zero. It also explains why the polygenic scores do not reliably predict disease states. Genomics alone is therefore a poor method for the discovery of treatments for polygenic diseases. Reliance on genomics has led to a gene-centric impasse in healthcare, which requires a shift in favour of physiological studies that can reveal genuine causation rather than just association. The case for such a shift includes understanding that DNA is not a good self-replicator in very large genomes. Self-replication of DNA and RNA in purely chemical environments confirms that fact. The error rate would amount to hundreds of thousands in a genome of three billion base pairs. Living cells can orchestrate the enzymes necessary for nearly perfect replication before cell division by correcting those errors. These cellular proof-reading processes also open the way to control processes that are used to generate new DNA sequences when the immune and other systems need to do so.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.